🚀 Vietnam Blockchain Business Opportunities

Complete Analysis: Pain Points, Solutions & Go-to-Market Strategies

Generated: October 2025

📋 Mục Lục

📊 Executive Summary

Tình huống: Doanh nghiệp Việt Nam có nhiều vấn đề liên quan đến trust, transparency và traceability mà blockchain có thể giải quyết hiệu quả.

Key Finding: Không phải mọi use case đều phù hợp. Chỉ tập trung vào những vấn đề có:
  • ✅ Pain severity cao (8+/10)
  • ✅ Willingness to pay cao (7+/10)
  • ✅ Market size đủ lớn (>1000 tỷ VND)
  • ✅ Blockchain là solution tốt nhất (không phải over-engineering)

Top 3 Recommendations (Priority Order)

🎫 #1: Event Ticketing
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Quick wins, proven demand, high WTP

🏠 #2: Real Estate
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Highest value contracts, clear pain

📦 #3: Supply Chain
⭐⭐⭐⭐

Large brands, recurring revenue

1. Ý Tưởng Ban Đầu: Transparent Voucher System

Problem Statement

Các nền tảng voucher hiện tại bị abuse:

  • Farmers tạo nhiều tài khoản để claim vouchers
  • Quay số trúng thưởng bị nghi ngờ "trúng nhà"
  • Voucher nhân viên không minh bạch
  • Thiếu trust từ customers

Proposed Solution

Blockchain-based voucher system với KYC verification và transparent lottery mechanism.

Reality Check Analysis

Use Case Market Demand Feasibility Verdict
Quay số trúng thưởng ⭐⭐⭐⭐ High ⭐⭐⭐⭐ Good ✅ Viable - Brands need this
Voucher nhân viên nội bộ ⭐⭐ Low ⭐⭐ Difficult ❌ Skip - Over-engineering
Vé concert/phim ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Very High ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Excellent ✅✅✅ BEST - Focus here!
Marketing voucher ⭐⭐⭐ Medium ⭐⭐⭐ Challenging ⚠️ Niche only - Fintech fraud prevention

💡 Pivot Recommendation

Thay vì làm "general voucher platform", nên focus vào Event Ticketing trước vì:

  • Pain point cực kỳ rõ ràng (scalping là vấn nạn quốc gia)
  • Users sẵn sàng trả phí cao (5-10% platform fee acceptable)
  • Precedent quốc tế (GET Protocol, Ticketmaster blockchain)
  • UX tốt (users không cần hiểu blockchain)

2. Top 5 Business Opportunities in Vietnam

🥇 #1: Real Estate Tokenization & Land Registry

Pain Severity
10/10
Willingness to Pay
10/10
Market Size
$40-50B
Blockchain Fit
10/10

Why This is #1

  • Extreme pain: Sổ đỏ giả, tranh chấp quyền sở hữu = mất trắng hàng tỷ
  • High transaction value: Average 2-5 tỷ VND/deal
  • Current solution terrible: Giấy tờ dễ giả, verify thủ công
  • Clear revenue model: 0.5-1% platform fee = 20-100M VND/transaction

Target Customers

  • Real estate developers (VinGroup, Novaland, Hưng Thịnh)
  • Property buyers (bảo vệ khỏi fraud)
  • Government (Bộ Tài Nguyên & Môi Trường - digital sổ đỏ)
  • Retail investors (fractional ownership)

🥈 #2: Supply Chain Anti-Counterfeiting

Pain Severity
10/10
Willingness to Pay
9/10
Market Size
Very Large
Blockchain Fit
9/10

Problem

10-30% market share bị hàng giả chiếm. Ví dụ:

  • Sữa giả, thuốc giả → Nguy hiểm tính mạng
  • Mỹ phẩm fake → Brand mất uy tín
  • Điện thoại dựng → Warranty issues

Target Industries

  • Tier 1: FMCG & Pharma (Vinamilk, Masan, Traphaco)
  • Tier 2: Luxury goods & Electronics
  • Tier 3: Export products (EU traceability requirements)

🥉 #3: Cross-Border Remittance

Pain Severity
9/10
Willingness to Pay
10/10
Market Size
$17-20B
Blockchain Fit
10/10

Current Pain

  • Fee: 5-10% (người gửi $1000 mất $50-100)
  • Time: 2-5 ngày
  • Inconvenient: Phải ra Western Union

Blockchain Solution

  • Stablecoin (USDT/USDC) transfer
  • Fee: 1-2% (save 60-80%)
  • Time: 5-15 minutes (instant)
  • Mobile-first experience
⚠️ Why #3 not #1: Regulatory risk cao. VN chưa có framework rõ ràng cho stablecoin cross-border. Phải đợi Nghị quyết 05 triển khai đầy đủ.

🏅 #4: Healthcare - Medical Records & Drug Traceability

Pain Severity
9/10
Willingness to Pay
8/10
Market Size
Large
Blockchain Fit
8/10

Two Major Problems

Problem 1: Fragmented medical records

  • Khám bệnh viện A → Sang B phải làm lại xét nghiệm
  • Waste hàng nghìn tỷ/năm

Problem 2: Counterfeit drugs

  • 10-15% thuốc VN là giả (WHO estimate)
  • Nguy hiểm tính mạng + Brand damage

🎖️ #5: Education - Verifiable Credentials

Pain Severity
8/10
Willingness to Pay
8/10
Market Size
Large
Blockchain Fit
10/10

Perfect Use Case for Blockchain

  • 20-30% CV có bằng giả hoặc thông tin sai
  • Company không verify được (gọi trường mất thời gian)
  • Digital certificates = NFT → Instant verification
  • Market: 400 universities × 1M graduates/year

3. Deep Dive: Event Ticketing (Recommended Focus)

Why This is THE Opportunity

✅ Strengths

  • Pain point ai cũng thấy (scalping = national issue)
  • High WTP (entertainment có margin tốt)
  • User experience smooth (không cần hiểu blockchain)
  • Precedent rõ ràng (GET Protocol, YellowHeart proven)
  • Quick time to market (6-12 months)
  • Regulatory OK (không phải "tài sản mã hóa" tradable)

⚠️ Challenges

  • Existing players (Ticketbox, Moveek)
  • Network effect (cần nhiều events để attract users)
  • Organizer adoption (phải educate về benefits)
  • KYC friction (balance security vs convenience)

Solution Architecture

// Smart Contract: Anti-Scalping Ticket System contract AntiScalpingTicket { struct Ticket { uint256 id; uint256 eventId; address owner; uint256 faceValue; uint256 purchaseTime; bool used; TransferHistory[] transfers; } struct TicketConfig { uint256 maxTicketsPerPerson; // Limit: 2 tickets/person bool requireKYC; // Force KYC bool allowTransfer; // Allow resale? uint256 transferCooldown; // Wait 24h before transfer uint256 maxTransferPrice; // Max resale = 1.2x face value } function purchaseTicket(uint256 eventId) public { // 1. Check KYC require(isKYCVerified[msg.sender], "Must complete KYC"); // 2. Check limit per person uint256 owned = getUserTicketCount(eventId, msg.sender); require(owned < config.maxTicketsPerPerson, "Exceeded limit"); // 3. Anti-bot: Captcha verification require(hasPassedCaptcha[msg.sender], "Complete captcha"); // 4. Mint ticket NFT _mintTicket(eventId, msg.sender); } function transferTicket( uint256 ticketId, address newOwner, uint256 price ) public { Ticket storage ticket = tickets[ticketId]; require(ticket.owner == msg.sender, "Not owner"); // Anti-scalping rules require( block.timestamp >= ticket.purchaseTime + config.transferCooldown, "Too early to transfer (wait 24h)" ); require( price <= ticket.faceValue * 120 / 100, "Price too high (max 120% of face value)" ); // Buyer must also KYC require(isKYCVerified[newOwner], "Buyer must complete KYC"); // Transfer ownership ticket.owner = newOwner; ticket.transfers.push(Transfer({ from: msg.sender, to: newOwner, price: price, timestamp: block.timestamp })); } }

Business Model

Revenue Stream Rate Example
Platform fee (primary sale) 6-8% Concert 10k vé × 2M × 6% = 12M VND/show
Transfer fee (resale) 3% Vé bán lại 2.2M × 3% = 66k/vé
Organizer subscription 5-10M/month Analytics, marketing tools
Projected Year 1 50 events × 12M avg = 600M VND revenue

Go-to-Market Strategy

Phase 1: Indie Concerts (Months 1-6)
  • Target small venues (500-2000 capacity)
  • Offer FREE platform (zero commission first 3 months)
  • Build case studies
  • Goal: 20 successful events
Phase 2: Mainstream Events (Months 6-18)
  • Partner với các festivals (Ravolution, 7Mountains)
  • Cinema chains (CGV, Lotte Cinema)
  • Sports (V-League, ABL basketball)
  • Goal: 100+ events/year
Phase 3: Platform Expansion (Year 2+)
  • White-label solution for venues
  • API for third-party integrators
  • Expand to Thailand, Philippines

4. Deep Dive: Real Estate Tokenization

The Opportunity

Market Size: Vietnam real estate transactions: $40-50B annually

Core Problems:

  • Sổ đỏ giả → Người mua mất trắng
  • Tranh chấp quyền sở hữu → Kiện tụng kéo dài
  • Fractional ownership không khả thi → Millennials bị loại khỏi market
  • Settlement chậm → Escrow phức tạp

Three-Tier Solution

Tier 1: Property Tokenization (Private Sector)

Target: Real estate developers

Value Prop: "Tokenize properties → Sell faster, attract more buyers"

How it works:

  1. Developer issues tokens for project (e.g., 1000 units = 1000 tokens)
  2. Buyers purchase tokens online (reserve units)
  3. Smart contract escrow holds funds
  4. On handover → Auto-transfer ownership

Benefits:

  • No middleman → Lower fees
  • Instant verification → Faster sales
  • Transparent pricing → Build trust

Revenue: 0.5-1% per transaction = 20-100M VND per deal

Tier 2: Fractional Ownership

Target: Retail investors with limited capital

Example:

Property: Vinhomes apartment, 5 tỷ VND Tokenization: 5000 tokens × 1M VND each Investor A buys 10 tokens (10M VND) = 0.2% ownership → Receives monthly rental yield proportionally → Can sell tokens anytime on secondary market Benefits: ✅ Affordable entry (chỉ cần 1-10M thay vì vài tỷ) ✅ Diversification (mua nhiều properties) ✅ Liquidity (trade tokens dễ hơn bán cả căn)

Revenue Model:

  • Initial token sale: 2-3% fee
  • Secondary trading: 0.5% per trade
  • Property management: 1-2% annual fee

Tier 3: Digital Land Registry (Government)

Target: Bộ Tài Nguyên & Môi Trường

Pilot Proposal:

  • Digitize land registry tại 1 quận/huyện
  • Issue digital sổ đỏ (NFT certificates)
  • Instant verification via app/website
  • Immutable ownership record

Government Benefits:

  • Eliminate fake documents (100% prevention)
  • Reduce processing time (90% faster)
  • Transparent transactions (anti-money laundering)
  • Lower administrative costs

Revenue: Government contract (hundreds of billions VND level)

Implementation Timeline

Phase Timeline Activities Expected Revenue
Pilot Months 1-6 1-2 developer partnerships, tokenize small projects 50-100M VND
Scale Private Months 6-18 5-10 developers, launch fractional platform 500M-1B VND
Government Year 2-3 Lobby, win pilot tender, implement in 1 province 5-10B VND (contract)

5. Deep Dive: Supply Chain Anti-Counterfeiting

Market Context

Problem Scale:

  • Counterfeit goods: 10-30% of market in various categories
  • Brand damage: Lost revenue + reputation harm
  • Consumer risk: Health/safety issues (fake drugs, food)
  • Export barriers: EU requires traceability

Solution: Product Provenance Tracking

System Architecture: ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Manufacturing (Factory) │ │ • Each product gets unique ID │ │ • Record: Batch, date, ingredients │ │ • Upload to blockchain │ └─────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Distribution (Warehouse → Retailer) │ │ • Scan at each checkpoint │ │ • Log: Location, timestamp, handler │ │ • Update blockchain │ └─────────────┬───────────────────────────────┘ │ ▼ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │ Retail (Store/Pharmacy) │ │ • Verify incoming stock authentic │ │ • Consumer scans QR before purchase │ │ • Mark as "sold" on blockchain │ └─────────────────────────────────────────────┘ Consumer Experience: 1. Scan QR code on product 2. App shows: ✅ "Authentic Vinamilk product" 📍 Produced: Factory A, Date: 2025-10-01 🚚 Shipped: 2025-10-05 🏪 Arrived store: 2025-10-08 If fake: ❌ "Warning: Product not found in Vinamilk database" ⚠️ "Possible counterfeit - do not purchase"

Target Industries (Priority Order)

Tier 1: Pharmaceutical (Highest Urgency)

Why:

  • Life-threatening risk from fake drugs
  • High value products (expensive medicines)
  • Regulatory pressure (Bộ Y Tế crackdown)
  • Brand protection critical

Target Companies: Traphaco, Domesco, Hasan Pharma, DHG Pharma

Pricing: 500-1000 VND per drug package

Tier 2: FMCG (Large Volume)

Focus: Dairy, beverages, personal care

Target: Vinamilk, TH True Milk, Masan, Unilever VN

Pricing: 200-500 VND per unit (volume discount)

Tier 3: Export Products (EU Compliance)

Driver: EU regulations require traceability for imports

Target: Coffee exporters, seafood, agricultural products

Value Prop: "Comply with EU requirements → Maintain market access"

Revenue Projection

Conservative Scenario:
  • 5 pharma companies × 100M packages/year × 500 VND = 250M VND/year
  • 2 FMCG brands × 500M units/year × 300 VND = 300M VND/year
  • Year 1 Total: ~550M VND
Aggressive Scenario:
  • 15 companies × average 5B VND/year = 75B VND/year (Year 3)

6. Technical Architecture

Blockchain Selection

Option Pros Cons Best For
Polygon Low fees, EVM-compatible, proven Centralization concerns Ticketing, Education
Hyperledger Fabric Private, permissioned, enterprise-ready Complex setup, less transparent Supply Chain, Real Estate (private)
Ethereum L2 Most decentralized, large ecosystem Higher fees than Polygon High-value assets (Real Estate)
Consortium Chain Custom rules, government-friendly Expensive to build Government projects only

Recommended Stack

Frontend: ├─ React/Next.js (Web) ├─ React Native (Mobile apps) └─ TailwindCSS (Styling) Backend: ├─ Node.js/Express (API server) ├─ PostgreSQL (Off-chain data) ├─ Redis (Caching) └─ Web3.js/Ethers.js (Blockchain interaction) Blockchain Layer: ├─ Smart Contracts: Solidity ├─ Network: Polygon (for consumer apps) ├─ Storage: IPFS (for metadata, images) └─ Indexing: The Graph (query blockchain data) Infrastructure: ├─ AWS/GCP (Cloud hosting) ├─ Cloudflare (CDN + DDoS protection) ├─ Vercel (Frontend deployment) └─ GitHub Actions (CI/CD) Security: ├─ KYC: Sumsub or Onfido API ├─ 2FA: Google Authenticator ├─ Smart contract audit: CertiK or OpenZeppelin └─ Penetration testing

Key Technical Considerations

1. Gas Fee Management

Problem: Users không muốn trả gas fee

Solution: Meta-transactions (Gasless UX)

// Users sign transaction off-chain // Relayer pays gas fee on behalf // Platform absorbs cost or includes in service fee Example: User mua vé concert → Sign transaction in app (no ETH needed) → Relayer submit on-chain → Platform pays $0.01 gas fee → Included in 6% platform fee

2. Scalability

Target: Handle 10,000 tickets sold in 1 minute (flash sales)

Solution:

  • Batch minting (mint 100 tickets in 1 transaction)
  • Off-chain queue → On-chain finalization
  • Layer 2 rollups (higher TPS)

3. Privacy vs Transparency

Balance:

  • Public: Campaign totals, winner lists (anonymized)
  • Private: Personal info (CCCD, địa chỉ) → Encrypted off-chain
  • On-chain: Only hashes and proofs

7. Business Model & Revenue Streams

Multi-Vertical Revenue Strategy

Vertical Revenue Model Year 1 Target Year 3 Target
Ticketing • Platform fee: 6-8%
• Resale fee: 3%
• Organizer subscription
600M VND
(50 events)
5B VND
(300+ events)
Real Estate • Transaction fee: 0.5-1%
• Fractional token fee: 2-3%
• Gov contract
500M VND
(pilot)
10-20B VND
(scale + gov)
Supply Chain • Per-unit fee: 300-1000 VND
• Enterprise subscription
• Analytics premium
300M VND
(3-5 brands)
3-5B VND
(15+ brands)
Education • Setup fee: 50-100M
• Annual sub: 20-50M
• Per-certificate: 20-50k
200M VND
(10 universities)
1-2B VND
(50+ universities)
TOTAL PROJECTED REVENUE ~1.6B VND 19-32B VND

Unit Economics Example (Ticketing)

Concert Event: ├─ 5,000 tickets × 1,500,000 VND = 7.5B VND GMV ├─ Platform fee: 7% = 525M VND revenue │ ├─ Costs: │ ├─ Gas fees (batch mint): 5M VND │ ├─ Server/infrastructure: 10M VND │ ├─ Payment processing: 2% = 15M VND │ ├─ Customer support: 5M VND │ └─ Marketing: 50M VND │ └─ Net profit: 525M - 85M = 440M VND (84% margin!) Year 1 target: 50 events → If average profit/event = 100M VND → Total profit = 5B VND Operating costs: ├─ Team (10 người): 2B VND/year ├─ Office + ops: 500M VND/year ├─ Marketing: 1B VND/year └─ Total: 3.5B VND/year Break-even: ~35 events Profitable from event #36 onwards

Funding Strategy

Bootstrap → Seed → Series A

Phase 1: Bootstrap (0-12 months)

  • Initial capital: 500M-1B VND (founders + angels)
  • Focus: Build MVP, get first 10 customers
  • Milestone: Prove PMF (product-market fit)

Phase 2: Seed Round (Month 12-18)

  • Raise: $500k-1M USD (~12-25B VND)
  • Investors: Vietnam-focused VCs (Skymap, 500 Startups, Openspace)
  • Use: Scale team (20 người), expand to 100+ events

Phase 3: Series A (Year 2-3)

  • Raise: $5-10M USD
  • Investors: Regional VCs + strategic (Grab Ventures, etc.)
  • Use: Multi-vertical expansion, regional expansion

8. Go-to-Market Strategy

Phase 1: Beachhead Strategy (Months 1-6)

Focus: Indie Music Scene

Why start here:

  • Small events (500-2000 people) = Lower risk
  • Organizers are tech-savvy, open to innovation
  • Tight community = Word of mouth
  • They ALSO suffer from scalping

Tactics:

  1. Identify 20 indie concerts in Hanoi/HCMC
  2. Offer FREE platform for first 3 months
  3. Hands-on support (help them succeed)
  4. Capture testimonials + case studies

Success Metric: 15/20 events successful, 80%+ customer satisfaction

Phase 2: Cross the Chasm (Months 6-18)

Expand to Mainstream

Target Segments:

  • Festivals: Ravolution, 7Mountains Festival, Epizode
  • Cinema: CGV, Lotte Cinema (premiere events)
  • Sports: V-League football, ABL basketball
  • Corporate events: Company parties, conferences

Pitch: "We helped 20 indie concerts eliminate scalping and increase revenue by 15%"

Partnership Strategy:

  • Approach via warm intro (use indie organizers as references)
  • Pilot with 1 event before full commitment
  • Success-based pricing (lower fee if they're not satisfied)

Phase 3: Platform Dominance (Year 2+)

Become THE Ticketing Infrastructure

Strategies:

  1. White-label: Venues can brand as their own ticketing
  2. API: Third-parties integrate our anti-scalping tech
  3. Network effect: More events → More users → More valuable
  4. Regional expansion: Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia

Marketing Channels

Channel Tactic Budget (Year 1)
Content Marketing • Blog: "How to prevent ticket scalping"
• Case studies from pilot events
• SEO for "event ticketing Vietnam"
100M VND
PR & Media • Press release for major events
• Interview on VnExpress, Tuổi Trẻ
• Podcast appearances
150M VND
Partnerships • Co-marketing with event organizers
• Integration with booking platforms
• University student clubs
200M VND
Paid Ads • Facebook/Instagram ads targeting event-goers
• Google Ads for "concert tickets"
• TikTok for youth audience
300M VND
Community • Build fan groups for major artists
• Reddit/Facebook groups for music lovers
• Discord server for early adopters
50M VND

9. Final Recommendations & Next Steps

🎯 Recommended Strategy: Portfolio Approach

CORE FOCUS (70% resources):

  • Ticketing: Best immediate opportunity, proven demand, quick revenue
  • Real Estate: Highest value contracts, clear pain point

SECONDARY BETS (20% resources):

  • Supply Chain: Pharma/FMCG partnerships, recurring revenue
  • Education: Easy MVP, government interest growing

AVOID FOR NOW (0% resources):

  • Remittance: Wait for regulatory clarity on stablecoins
  • Employee vouchers: Over-engineering, low demand

Immediate Action Items (Next 30 Days)

  1. Customer Discovery:
    • Interview 10 event organizers about pain points
    • Survey 50 concert-goers about ticket buying experience
    • Interview 5 real estate developers about tokenization
  2. MVP Definition:
    • Scope ticketing MVP features (core only)
    • Create mockups/wireframes
    • Get feedback from 3 potential pilot customers
  3. Technical Validation:
    • Build smart contract POC (test on testnet)
    • Create simple demo (Figma prototype + fake blockchain)
    • Test with 5 users, gather feedback
  4. Legal & Regulatory:
    • Consult lawyer về Nghị quyết 05/2025
    • Determine if ticketing NFTs need license
    • Draft terms of service, privacy policy
  5. Team Building:
    • Recruit 1 blockchain developer (Solidity)
    • Recruit 1 full-stack developer (React + Node.js)
    • Recruit 1 BD/sales person (event industry connections)

60-Day Milestone: Secure First Pilot

Goal: Sign LOI (Letter of Intent) with 1 event organizer for paid pilot

Success Criteria:

  • Event size: 1000-3000 tickets
  • Payment: At least 50% of normal platform fee (3-4%)
  • Timeline: Event within 90 days
  • Commitment: Testimonial if successful

90-Day Milestone: Live MVP

Deliverables:
  • Working ticketing platform (web + mobile responsive)
  • Smart contracts deployed on Polygon mainnet
  • KYC integration (Sumsub or similar)
  • Payment gateway (Stripe or local banking)
  • QR code scanner for check-in

Launch Event: First paid pilot concert

6-Month Milestone: Product-Market Fit

Metrics to Prove PMF:
  • 15+ successful events (no major issues)
  • 10,000+ tickets sold through platform
  • NPS score >40 (organizers satisfaction)
  • 80%+ repeat rate (organizers use again)
  • 3+ organic referrals (word of mouth working)

If achieved → Ready for Seed fundraising

Risk Mitigation

Risk Likelihood Impact Mitigation
Regulatory crackdown Medium High • Consult lawyers early
• Build relationship with regulators
• Have pivot plan (non-blockchain version)
Incumbent response (Ticketbox copies) High Medium • Move fast, build moat (network effect)
• Patent key innovations
• Lock-in via exclusive partnerships
Low adoption (users don't care) Medium High • Extensive user testing
• Make blockchain invisible
• Focus on benefits, not tech
Technical failure (smart contract bug) Low Very High • Thorough testing
• Professional audit (CertiK)
• Bug bounty program
• Insurance for smart contracts
Team turnover Medium Medium • Competitive compensation
• Equity/token incentives
• Document everything
• Cross-training

Success Indicators (KPIs to Track)

Growth Metrics

  • GMV (Gross Merchandise Value): Total ticket sales value
  • Number of events: Monthly active events on platform
  • Number of tickets sold: Total tickets per month
  • Average ticket value: GMV / tickets sold

Quality Metrics

  • NPS (Net Promoter Score): Would customers recommend?
  • Repeat rate: % organizers who use platform again
  • Fraud prevention: % reduction in scalping vs traditional
  • User satisfaction: App store ratings, reviews

Financial Metrics

  • Revenue: Monthly recurring revenue (MRR)
  • Take rate: Platform fee % of GMV
  • CAC (Customer Acquisition Cost): Cost to acquire 1 organizer
  • LTV (Lifetime Value): Expected revenue per organizer
  • LTV/CAC ratio: Should be >3x for healthy unit economics
  • Burn rate: Monthly cash spent
  • Runway: Months until cash runs out

Competitor Analysis

Competitor Strengths Weaknesses Your Advantage
Ticketbox • Market leader in VN
• Large event portfolio
• Brand recognition
• Still has scalping issues
• Old tech stack
• High fees (~10%)
• Blockchain = provably fair
• Lower fees (6-8%)
• Better fraud prevention
Moveek • Cinema focus
• Good UX
• Limited to movies
• No anti-scalping features
• Multi-vertical (concerts, sports, etc.)
• NFT tickets = collectibles
Facebook Events • Free
• Huge user base
• No ticketing features
• No verification
• Fraud-prone
• Professional ticketing
• KYC verification
• Revenue for organizers
International (Ticketmaster) • Global scale
• Deep pockets
• Not in Vietnam yet
• Would be expensive
• Local presence
• Vietnam-specific features
• First-mover advantage

🚀 Final Words

Vietnam có nhiều vấn đề thực sự cần blockchain giải quyết. Nhưng không phải mọi problem đều phải dùng blockchain.

Key Principles:

  1. Problem First, Technology Second: Chỉ dùng blockchain khi nó thực sự là giải pháp tốt nhất
  2. Focus: Đừng làm "platform for everything". Pick 1-2 verticals và dominate
  3. Hide Complexity: Users không cần biết blockchain. Chỉ cần trải nghiệm tốt
  4. Prove Value: Metrics > Marketing. Show real results (% fraud reduction, time saved, cost saved)
  5. Move Fast: Market window won't stay open forever. Incumbents will copy

Recommendation: Start với Ticketing, scale nhanh, sau đó expand sang Real Estate và Supply Chain.

Nếu execution tốt, đây có thể là một $100M+ company trong 5 năm. 🚀

📞 Next Step:

Lên lịch customer interviews và bắt đầu build MVP. Time to market = competitive advantage!

Validation Checklist:

  • ☐ Interview 10+ potential customers
  • ☐ Build clickable prototype (Figma)
  • ☐ Get 3 LOIs (Letters of Intent) from organizers
  • ☐ Secure first pilot customer (paid)
  • ☐ Launch MVP within 90 days